Skip to main content
JiLuDB
ExploreAll recordsTimelinePlacesMapAbout
Search records, people, places…
Public site
LANG
ExploreAll recordsTimelinePlacesMapAbout
JiLuDB

Explore the World's Records

GLOBAL RECORDS DATABASE

HomeAll recordsTimelinePlacesAbout

© 2026 JiLuDB. All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. /All records
  3. /Most Massive Known Star

Recording humanity Understanding the world / GLOBAL RECORDS DATABASE

Previous recordLowest Evaluated Systematic Fractional Uncertainty of an Optical Atomic ClockNext recordOldest Reported Pottery Remains
←→ Browse6 / 404Back to list
Immersive view

Record #00403Space archive

Most Massive Known Star

R136a1 in the Tarantula Nebula of the Large Magellanic Cloud is among the most massive known stars. A 2025 hydrodynamic atmosphere model estimated its present-day mass at roughly 233 solar masses, although other observing and modelling methods yield different ranges.

Verification status
Evidence-backedView verification details ↗
Last updated
2026-11-05
Category index
Space

ARCHIVE VISUAL / 01

NOT TO SCALE

Current Record

about233solar masses

Current record value

Holder
R136a1
Location
—
Start date
—
Record status
Evidence-backedView verification details ↗Report an issue
OverviewRecord historyRelated recordsSources

Overview

Archive Note

R136a1 resides in the R136 star cluster in 30 Doradus, the Tarantula Nebula in the Large Magellanic Cloud, about 160,000 light-years away. Its high luminosity and powerful stellar winds make direct mass measurement difficult.

Sharper Gemini observations reported in 2022 implied a mass range of roughly 170–230 solar masses. A 2025 hydrodynamic stellar-wind atmosphere analysis yielded 233 solar masses. These broadly neighbouring estimates depend on models and should not be treated as direct weighing.

Key information

2025 modelled mass
About 233 solar masses
2022 imaging range
About 170–230 solar masses
Cluster
R136
Nebula
30 Doradus (Tarantula Nebula)
Distance from Earth
About 160,000 light-years

Record history

1 Milestones
  1. —about 233 solar massesR136a1Current Record

Related records

Continue Exploring
01

Space · #00059

Longest Single Human Spaceflight

Verified

437 days 17 hours 38 minutes

Valeri Polyakov

02

Space · #00041

Largest natural satellite in the Solar System by diameter

Verified

5,268 km

Ganymede

03

Space · #00017

First Human-Made Object to Enter Interstellar Space

Verified

2012-08-25 date

Voyager 1

Sources

Evidence & References

Verification basis and limitations

Evidence-backed

Credible sources support core facts; the comparison scope or corroboration remains incomplete.

Basis: corroborating reliable secondary materials

The peer-reviewed 2025 Astronomy & Astrophysics study derives a present-day mass of 233 solar masses for R136a1 using hydrodynamically consistent stellar-wind atmosphere models. The US NSF's 2022 observational summary reported a lower 170–230 solar-mass estimate. Both are model-dependent and do not amount to a direct dynamical weighing of a single star; the leading-mass claim remains developing.

Comparison boundaries still under review

R136a1's quoted 233 solar masses is a modelled current mass, not its birth mass. The 2022 estimate of about 170–230 solar masses uses a different observational and modelling approach. Rankings are contingent on resolving close companions and updating stellar-wind models.

Verification assessment
2026-11-05
Last editorial review
2026-11-05

Current Entry identifies the current entry in this archive; it does not establish that the record is still held today.

Source IDSourcePublisherLink
SRC-001A new mass estimate method with hydrodynamical atmospheres for very massive WNh starsAcademicENCurrent recordAstronomy & AstrophysicsSRC-002Sharpest image to date of universe's most massive known starOfficialENCurrent recordUS National Science Foundation

The record value on this page is organized from the public sources above. Measurement methods may differ; JiLuDB follows the unified method described for each entry.

Public feedbackFound a data issue?If a fact has changed, the data is incorrect, or you know a more authoritative source, submit feedback.Submit feedback

Help keep the archive accurate

If a fact has changed, a value is incorrect, or you know a more authoritative source, leave a note. Feedback enters an administrator review workflow and never edits a record directly.

Previous recordLowest Evaluated Systematic Fractional Uncertainty of an Optical Atomic ClockNext recordOldest Reported Pottery Remains
Back to list
Previous recordLowest Evaluated Systematic Fractional Uncertainty of an Optical Atomic ClockNext recordOldest Reported Pottery Remains